Modelación de las fronteras del barrio caminable con modelos de elección discreta
Palabras clave:
Barrio, Caminata, AccesibilidadResumen
La noción de barrio caminable es fundamental para el desarrollo de políticas públicas en diversas áreas. Involucra la caminata, la definición de barrio y la accesibilidad. Este trabajo busca responder la pregunta ¿Cómo impactan los elementos del uso de suelo y su distribución espacial en un área urbana a la percepción del límite de barrio caminable de sus habitantes? Se presentan resultados obtenidos a partir de una encuesta que utiliza una técnica novedosa para la identificación del “barrio caminable” de un individuo. Un modelo para el límite del barrio caminable es especificado y estimado. A partir de los resultados, se concluye la importancia de la distancia interactuada con el perfil social del individuo y la atractividad de los lugres a los que se desplaza.
Citas
Ben-Akiva, M., Walker, J., Bernardino, A., Gopinath, D., Morikawa, T., & Polydoro-poulou, A. (2002). Integration of Choice and Latent Variable Models. Perpetual motion: Travel behaviour research opportunities and application challanges, 431-470.
Bierlaire, M. (2003). BIOGEME: A free package for the estimation of discrete choice models, Proceedings of the 3rd Swiss Transportation Research Conference, Ascona, Switzerland.
Boyd, J. H., & Mellman, R. E. (1980). The effect of fuel economy standards on the US automotive market: an hedonic demand analysis. ransportation Research Part A: General, 14(5-6), 367-378.
Cardell, N., & Dunbar, F. (1980). Measuring the societal impacts of automobile downsizing. Transportation Research 14A(5-6), 423-434.
Cole, R., Leslie, E., Bauman, A., Donald, M., & Owen, N. (2006). Sociodemographic variations in walking for transport and for recreation or exercise among adult Australians. J Phys Activity Health, 3:164-78.
Contribuidores de OpenStreetMaps (15 de 5 de 2017). Mapa recuperado de https://planet.osm.org. Obtenido de OpenStreetMap: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=12/-33.4544/-70.6242
Coulton, C. J., Korbin, J., Chan, T., & Su, M. (2001). Mapping resident's perceptions of neighborhood boundaries: A methodological note. American journal of community psychology, 371-383.
Dalvi, M., & Martin, K. (1976). The measurement of accessibility: some preliminary results. Transportation 5, 17-42.
Domencich, T., & McFadden, D. (1975). Urban Travel Demand: A Behavioral Analysis. North-Holland Publishing Company.
Downs, R. M., & Stea, D. (1973). Cognitive maps and spatial behavior: Process and products. Image and environment, 8-26.
Fadda, G., & Cortés, A. (2015). Barrios. En busca de su definición en Valparaiso. Asuntos Urbanos Nacionales, 10(16), 50-59.
Geurs, K. T., & van Wee, B. (2004). Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. Journal of transport geography, 127-140.
Guest, A. M., & Lee, B. A. (1984). How urbanites define their neighborhoods. Population & Environment, 32-56.
Handy, S. L., & Clifton, K. J. (2001). Evaluating neighborhood accessibility: Possibilities and practicalities. Journal of transportation and statistics, 4(2/3), 67-78.
Handy, S. L., Clifton, K., & & Fisher, J. (1998). The effectiveness of land use policies as a strategy for reducing automobile dependence: a study of
Austin neighborhoods (No. SWUTC/98/465650-1,). Southwest Region University Transportation Center, Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas at Austin.
Handy, S., & Clifton, K. (2001). Local shopping as a strategy for reducing automobile travel. Transportation 28, 317-346.
Hansen, W. (1959). How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of American Institute of Planners 25 (1), 73–76.
Heath, G., Brownson, R., & Kruger, J. (2006). The effectiveness of urban design and land use and transport policies and practices to increase physical activity: A systematic review. L Phys Activity Health, 55-71.
Humpel, N., Marshall, A. L., Leslie, E., Bauman, A., & Owen, N. (2004). Changes in neighborhood walking are related to changes in perceptions of environmental attributes. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 27(1), 60-67.
Jenks, M., & Dempsey, N. (2007). Defining the neighbourhood: Challenges for empirical research. The town planning review, 78(2), 153-177.
Keller, S. (1968). The urban neighborhood: a sociological perspective. New York: Random House.
Lee, C., & Moudon, A. V. (2004). Physical activity and environment research in the health field: implications for urban and transportation planning practice and research. Journal of planning literature , 19(2), 147-181.
Lee, T. (1968). Urban Neighbourhood as a Socio-Spatial Schema. Human Relations, 21(3), 241-267.
Martinez, F. J. (1992). The bid—choice land-use model: an integrated economic framework. Environment and Planning A, 24(6), 871-885.
Matley, T., Goldman, L., & Fineman, B. (2000). Pedestrian travel potential in Northern New Jersey: A metropolitan Planning organization's approach to identifying investment priorities. ransportation Research Record:
Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (1705), 1-8.
McFadden, D. L. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers in econometrics, 105-142.
Minvu (2017). Ministerio de Vivienda y Urbanismo - Gobierno de Chile - (Quiero Mi Barrio). [online] Disponible en: http://www.minvu.cl/opensite_20070212164909.aspx [Accessed 15 Jun. 2017].
Neyman, J. and Pearson, E. S. (1933). On the Problem of the Most Efficient Tests of Statistical Hypotheses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 231, (694–706): 289–337.
Ortuzar, J. d., & Willumsen, L. G. (2011). Modelling Transport(4th ed. ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Owen, N., Cerin, E., Leslie, E., duToit, L., Coffee, N., Frank, L. D., . . . Sallis, J. F. (2007). Neighborhood Walkability and the Walking Behavior of Australian Adults. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 395.
Revelt, D., & Train, K. (1998). Mixed logit with repeated choices: households' choices of appliance efficiency level. Review of economics and statistics, 80(4), 647-657.
Saelens, B. E., & Handy, S. L. (2008). Built Environment Correlates of Walking: A Review. Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 40(7 Suppl), S550.
Sistema de impuestos internos (2017). GobiernoTransparente. [online] Available at: https://zeus.sii.cl/cvc_cgi/dfmun/dfmun_repGobierno.cgi [Accessed 15 May 2017].
Smith, G., Gidlow, C., Davey, R., & Foster, C. (2010). What is my walking neighbourhood? A pilot study od English adults` definitions of their local walking neighbourhood. International Journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 7(1), 34.
Train, K. E. (2003). Discrete choice methods with simulation. San Francisco, California: Cambridge University Press.
Wen, M., Kandula, N. R., & Lauderdale, D. S. (2007). Walking for transportation or leisure: what difference does the neighborhood make? Journal of general internal medicine, 22(12), 1674-1680.
