Participación Ciudadana para el Transporte Sustentable: El Caso de Ciudad Viva, Santiago Chile (1997-2012)
Palabras clave:
ciudadanía, transporte sustentable, complejidadResumen
Las “revueltas” ciudadanas del siglo XX en contra de proyectos de autopistas urbanas influyen en la planificación del transporte público (Toronto, Vancouver, Nueva York), gobernanza (Portland), y ciclo-inclusividad (Holanda) hasta hoy. Sabemos menos, sin embargo, acerca de cómo estos conflictos emergen en países en desarrollo, y lo que pueden revelar del rol de la ciudadanía en las innovaciones necesarias para lograr sistemas de transporte más sustentable.
Utilizando una metodología basada en la complejidad, este estudio de caso examina un movimiento social que surgió en Santiago, Chile (1997) oponiéndose a la primera concesión de autopista urbana, desafiando y cambiando las paradigmas de la planificación. En 2000, esta campaña fundó una institución ciudadana, Ciudad Viva. Doce años después, se convirtió en una institución de urbanismo ciudadano, ganadora de importantes premios y logros.
Esta experiencia sugiere que repensar la ciudad y el transporte como sistemas complejos abiertos, y darle espacio al liderazgo de “planificadores ciudadanos”, abre camino a estrategias más efectivas de innovación en el transporte.
Citas
Allen, P. M. 2012. Cities: The Visible Expression of Co-evolving Complexity. In Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come of Age An Overview with Implications to Urban Planning y Design, eds. J. Portugali, H. Meyer, E. Stolk & E. Tan, 67-89. New York: Springer.
Associated Press. 2010. Piñera wins Chilean election. USA Today 1-17-2010.
Batty, M. 2010. Complexity in City Systems: Understanding, Evolution, y Design. In A Planner's Encounter with Complexity, eds. G. d. Roo & E. A. Silva, 99-121. Farnham, Surrey [U.K.] ; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Batty, M. & P. Longley. 1994. Fractal cities: a geometry of form y function. London; San Diego ; Toronto: Academic Press.
Beckman, J. (2001) Automobility a social problem and theoretical concept. Environment and Planning D: Society y Space, 19.
Bickerstaff, K., R. Tolley & G. Walker (2002) Transport planning and participation: the rhetoric y realities of public involvement. Journal of Transport Geography.
Bird, T. (2008) We Have Ways to Make you Green: Five secrets of successful social marketing. Alternatives Journal, 34, 28-31.
Boonstra, B. & L. Boelens (2011) Self-organization in urban development: towards a new perspective on spatial planning. Urban Research & Practice, 4, 99-122.
Byrne, D. S. 1998. Complexity theory and the social sciences an Introduction. Routledge: elibrary. University of Toronto, Canada.
---. 2001a. Understanding the urban. Houndmills, Basingstoke [England]; New York: Palgrave.
--- (2005) Complexity, Configurations and Cases. Theory, Culture & Society, 22, 95-111.
Cannon, J. (2012) Huntsville, the Highway, and Urban Redevelopment. Journal of Planning History, 11, 27-46.
Cilliers, P. 1998. Complexity and postmodernism: understanding complex systems. London; New York: Routledge.
---. 2005. Knowing complex systems. In Managing organizational complexity: philosophy, theory and application, ed. K. Richardson, viii, 571 p. Greenwich: IAP - Information Age Pub. Inc.
CONAMA. 1998-2000. File of official responses to the Environmental Impact Assessment filed by the Ministry of Public Works, on the Costanera Norte highway project.ed. R. E. Commission. Santiago, Chile: Living City archives.
Cornforth, M. C. 1977. Dialectical materialism: an Introduction.London: Lawrence & Wishart.
DICTUC-CV. 2011. Presentations of Santiago Cycling Master Plan Studies. In Citizen-Government Roundcuadro for Cycling Inclusivity. Santiago, Chile.
Evans, P. B. 2002. Livable cities?: urban struggles for livelihood and sustainability.Berkeley: University of California Press.
Fainstein, S. S. (2005) Planning Theory and the City. Journal Of Planning Education and Research, 25, 121-130.
---. 2010. The Just City.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Forester, J. 1999. The deliberative practitioner: encouraging participatory planning processes. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Friedmann, J. (2000) The Good City: In Defense of Utopian Thinking. International Journal of Urban y Regional Research, 24, 460-472.
Gastil, J. 2008. Political communication and deliberation. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
Giering, S. 2011. Public Participation Strategies for Transit A Synthesis of Transit Practice. In TCRP Synthesis 89, ed. T. C. R. Program. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Gleick, J. 1994. Chaos Making a New Science. London: Abacus.
Gobierno Chile. 2005. Ley de Transparencia 20.285, Artículo 8 de la constitución. In Law No. 20,285, Santiago, Chile: Government of Chile.
---. 2011. Sobre Asociaciones y participación ciudadana en la gestión pública. In Ley 20.500, ed. G. o. Chile. Santiago, Chile: Ministerio Secretaría General de Gobierno.
Holling, C. S. (2001). Understanding the Complexity of Economic, Ecological, and Social Systems. Ecosystems, 4, 390-405.
Healey, P. 2006. Collaborative planning: shaping places in fragmented societies. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Huerta, M. A. 2000. Descentralización, municipio y participación ciudadana: Chile, Colombia y Guatemala. Bogotá: CEJA.
Hull, K. 2010. Effective Use of Citizen Advisory Committees for Transit Planning and Operations. In TCRP Synthesis 85, ed. T. R. Board. Washington, DC.
IAP2. 2011. Spectrum of public participation.
Innes, J. & D. Booher. 2010. Planning with Complexity. London and New York: Routledge.
Johnson, K. M. (2009) Captain Blake versus the Highwayman: Or, How San Francisco Won the Freeway Revolt. Journal of Planning History, 8, 56-83.
Kang, C. D. & R. Cervero (2009) From Elevated Freeway to Urban Greenway: Land Value Impacts of the CGC Project in Seoul, Korea. Urban Studies, 46, 2771-2794.
Kroeger Claussen, F. 2009. Renovación Pío Nono, Una experiencia de gestión territorial de la comunidad para la comunidad. Santiago, Chile: Ministerio del Interior, Innovación y Ciudadanía.
Kuhn, T. S. 1996. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ladd, B. 2008. Autophobia: love and hate in the automotive age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lagos, R. P. 2000. Instructivo Presidencial de Participación Ciudadana In N° 030 - 2000, Santiago, Chile: Presidency of Chile.
Lanfranco, P., R. Quijada & L. Sagaris. 2003. Muévete por tu ciudad: Una propuesta ciudadana de transporte con equidad. Santiago, Chile: Lom - Ciudad Viva.
Marshall, S. 2012. Planning, Design and the Complexity of Cities. In Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come of Age An Overview with Implications to Urban Planning and Design, eds. J. Portugali, H. Meyer, E. Stolk & E. Tan, 21-45. New York: Springer.
Maturana, H. R. & F. G. Varela. 1980. Autopoiesis and cognition: the realization of the living. Dordrecht, Holland ; Boston: D. Reidel Pub. Co.
McKenzie-Mohr, D. (2000) Fostering Sustainable Behavior Through Community-Based Social Marketing. American Psychologist, 55, 531-537.
Merry, U. 1995. Coping with uncertainty: insights from the new sciences of chaos, self-organization, y complexity. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.
Mohl, R. 2002. The interstates and the cities: Highways, housing and the freeway revolt. In Poverty and Race Research Action Council, 109. Birmingham, Alabama: Department of History, University of Alabama.
--- (2004) Stop the Road: Freeway Revolts in American Cities. Journal of Urban History, 30, 674-706.
--- (2008) The Interstates y the Cities: The US Department of Transportation and the Freeway Revolt 1966-1973. Journal of Policy History.
Mohl, R. A. & M. H. Rose (2012) The Post-Interstate Era. Journal of Planning History, 11, 3-7.
Nickson, R. A. 1995. Local government in Latin America. Boulder: L. Rienner Publishers.
OECD. 2011. Social Justice in the OECD How Do the Member States Compare, Sustainable Governance Indicators 2011.ed. B. Stifftung. Organization for Economic Cooperation y Development (OECD).
Oxhorn, P. 1995. Organizing civil society: the popular sectors and the struggle for democracy in Chile. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Phelan, S. E. (1999) A Note on the Correspondence Between Complexity and Systems Theory. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 12, 237-246.
Portugali, J. 2000. Self-organization and the city. Berlin: Springer.
---. 2011. Complexity, cognition and the city. Springer; elibrary Inc. University of Toronto, Canada.
---. 2012. Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come of Age An Overview with Implications to Urban Planning y Design. In Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come of Age, eds. J. Portugali, H. Meyer, E. Stolk & E. Tan, xiv, 433 p. New York: Springer.
Posner, P. W. (2003) Local democracy and popular participation: Chile and Brazil in comparative perspective. Democratization, 10, 39-67.
Reynolds, C. (1987). Flocks, Herds and Schools, A Distributed Behavioral Model. Computer Graphics, 21, 25-34.
Roo, G. d. & E. A. Silva. 2010. A planner's encounter with complexity. Farnham, Surrey [U.K.] ; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Rydin, Y. & M. Pennington (2000) Public Participation and Local Environmental Planning: the collective action problem y the potential social capital. Local Environment, 5, 153-169.
Sabatini, F., G. Wormald, C. Sierralta & P. A. Peters. 2009. Residential Segregation in Santiago: Scale-Related Effects and Trends, 1992–2002. In Urban Segregation y Governance in the Americas, eds. B. R. Roberts & R. H. Wilson. New York, US: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sagaris, L. & H. Olivo. 2010. El Plan Maestro de Ciclo Rutas del Bicentenario. Santiago, Chile: Santiago Regional Metropolitan Government, Interface for Cycling Expertise, Living City.
Scharmer, C. O. 2009. Theory U leading from the Future as it Emerges The Social Technology of Presencing. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Schragg, Z. (2004) The Freeway Fight in Washington D.C.: The Three Sisters Bridge in Three Administrations. Journal Of Urban History, 30, 648-673.
SECTRA. 2012. Partición modal Santiago. Santiago, Chile: SECTRA, Chilean Government.
Senge, P. M. 2006. The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency.
Sepúlveda, L. 2005. Ciudad Viva: Muévete por una ciudad mejor. Santiago, Chile: Fundación por la Innovación Ciudadana.
Stacey, R. D. 1996. Complexity and creativity in organizations. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
---. 2001. Complex responsive processes in organizations learning y knowledge creation. Routledge. E-book, University of Toronto Library, Canada.
---. 2003. Complexity and group processes: a radically social understanding of individuals. Hove, East Suffex: Brunner-Routledge.
---. 2010. Complexity and organizational reality: uncertainty and the need to rethink management after the collapse of investment capitalism. London ; New York: Routledge.
Stacey, R. D. & D. Griffin. 2005. A complexity perspective on researching organizations: taking experience seriously. London; New York: Routledge.
Stern, P. C. (2000) Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407-424.
Taylor, L. 1998. Citizenship, participation, and democracy: changing dynamics in Chile and Argentina. New York: Macmillan.
Tirachini, A. 2011. Effects of Pedestrian Mobility Barriers on Walking Distance. Sydney, Australia: Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies
Urry, J. (2004) The System of Automobility. Theory, Culture & Society, 21.
UyT, C. & CiudadViva. 2012. Plan Nosotros Contamos Informe Técnico No. 4, Santiago, Chile: Consultores UyT y Ciudad Viva.
Valle, M. 2003. eciclar es vivir mejor Gestión de residuos sólidos en La Chimba. In Ampliando la ciudadanía, promoviendo la participación: 30 innovaciones locales, eds. A. Surawski J. Cubillos. Santiago, Chile Instituto de Asuntos Públicos Fundación Nacional para la Superación de la Pobreza, Programa Ciudadanía y Gestión Local.
